What Is Empirical Research? Definition, Types & Samples for 2025

Co-Founder and Chief Data Scientist

How was the world formed? Are there parallel universes? Why does time move forward but never in reverse? These are longstanding questions that have yet to receive definitive answers up to now.

In research, these are called empirical questions, which ask about how the world is, how the world works, etc. Such questions are addressed by a corresponding type of study—called empirical research or the empirical method—which is concerned with actual events and phenomena.

What is an empirical study? Research is empirical if it seeks to find a general story or explanation, one that applies to various cases and across time. The empirical approach functions to create new knowledge about the way the world actually works. This article discusses the empirical research definition, concepts, types, processes, and other important aspects of this method. It also tackles the importance of identifying evidence in research.

I. What is Empirical Research?

A. Definitions

What is empirical evidence? Empirical research is defined as any study whose conclusions are exclusively derived from concrete, verifiable evidence. The term empirical basically means that it is guided by scientific experimentation and/or evidence. Likewise, a study is empirical when it uses real-world evidence in investigating its assertions.

This research type is founded on the view that direct observation of phenomena is a proper way to measure reality and generate truth about the world (Bhattacharya, 2008). And by its name, it is a methodology in research that observes the rules of empiricism and uses quantitative and qualitative methods for gathering evidence.

For instance, a study is being conducted to determine if working from home helps in reducing stress from highly-demanding jobs. An experiment is conducted using two groups of employees, one working at their homes, the other working at the office. Each group was observed. The outcomes derived from this research will provide empirical evidence if working from home does help reduce stress or not. This also applies to entrepreneurs when they use a small business idea generator instead of manual procedures.

B. Origins

It was the ancient Greek medical practitioners who originated the term empirical (empeirikos which means “experienced") when they began to deviate from the long-observed dogmatic principles to start depending on observed phenomena. Later on, empiricism pertained to a theory of knowledge in philosophy, which follows the belief that knowledge comes from evidence and experience derived particularly using the senses.

What ancient philosophers considered empirical research pertained to the reliance on observable data to design and test theories and reach conclusions. As such, empirical research is used to produce knowledge that is based on experience. At present, the word “empirical" pertains to the gathering of data using evidence that is derived through experience or observation or by using calibrated scientific tools.

Most of today’s outstanding empirical research outputs are published in prestigious journals. These scientific publications are considered high-impact journals because they publish research articles that tend to be the most cited in their fields.

II. Types and Methodologies of Empirical Research

Empirical research is done using either qualitative or quantitative methods.

Qualitative research Qualitative research methods are utilized for gathering non-numerical data. It is used to determine the underlying reasons, views, or meanings from study participants or subjects. Under the qualitative research design, empirical studies had evolved to test the conventional concepts of evidence and truth while still observing the fundamental principles of recognizing the subjects beings studied as empirical (Powner, 2015).

This method can be semi-structured or unstructured. Results from this research type are more descriptive than predictive. It allows the researcher to write a conclusion to support the hypothesis or theory being examined.

Due to realities like time and resources, the sample size of qualitative research is typically small. It is designed to offer in-depth information or more insight regarding the problem. Some of the most popular forms of methods are interviews, experiments, and focus groups.

Quantitative research Quantitative research methods are used for gathering information via numerical data. This type is used to measure behavior, personal views, preferences, and other variables. Quantitative studies are in a more structured format, while the variables used are predetermined.

Data gathered from quantitative studies is analyzed to address the empirical questions. Some of the commonly used quantitative methods are polls, surveys, and longitudinal or cohort studies.

There are situations when using a single research method is not enough to adequately answer the questions being studied. In such cases, a combination of both qualitative and quantitative methods is necessary. Also, papers can also make use of both primary and secondary research methods

III. Qualitative Empirical Research Methods

Some research question examples need to be gathered and analyzed qualitatively or quantitatively, depending on the nature of the study. These not only supply answers to empirical questions but also outline one’s scope of work. Here are the general types of qualitative research methods.

Observational Method

This involves observing and gathering data from study subjects. As a qualitative approach, observation is quite personal and time-intensive. It is often used in ethnographic studies to obtain empirical evidence.

The observational method is a part of the ethnographic research design, e.g., archival research, survey, etc. However, while it is commonly used for qualitative purposes, observation is also utilized for quantitative research, such as when observing measurable variables like weight, age, scale, etc.

One remarkable observational research was conducted by Abbott et al. (2016), a team of physicists from the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory who examined the very first direct observation of gravitational waves. According to Google Scholar’s (2019) Metrics ranking, this study is among the most highly cited articles from the world’s most influential journals (Crew, 2019).

Interview

This method is exclusively qualitative and is one of the most widely used (Jamshed, 2014). Its popularity is mainly due to its ability to allow researchers to obtain precise, relevant information if the correct questions are asked.

This method is a form of a conversational approach, where in-depth data can be obtained. Interviews are commonly used in the social sciences and humanities, such as for interviewing resource persons.

Case Study

This method is used to identify extensive information through an in-depth analysis of existing cases. It is typically used to obtain empirical evidence for investigating problems or business studies.

When conducting case studies, the researcher must carefully perform the empirical analysis, ensuring the variables and parameters in the current case are similar to the case being examined. From the findings of a case study, conclusions can be deduced about the topic being investigated.

Case studies are commonly used in studying the experience of organizations, groups of persons, geographic locations, etc.

Textual Analysis

This primarily involves the process of describing, interpreting, and understanding textual content. It typically seeks to connect the text to a broader artistic, cultural, political, or social context (Fairclough, 2003).

A relatively new research method, textual analysis is often used nowadays to elaborate on the trends and patterns of media content, especially social media. Data obtained from this approach are primarily used to determine customer buying habits and preferences for product development, and designing marketing campaigns.

Focus Groups

A focus group is a thoroughly planned discussion guided by a moderator and conducted to derive opinions on a designated topic. Essentially a group interview or collective conversation, this method offers a notably meaningful approach to think through particular issues or concerns (Kamberelis & Dimitriadis, 2011).

This research method is used when a researcher wants to know the answers to “how," “what," and “why" questions. Nowadays, focus groups are among the most widely used methods by consumer product producers for designing and/or improving products that people prefer.

IV. Quantitative Empirical Research Methods

Quantitative methods primarily help researchers to better analyze the gathered evidence. Here are the most common types of quantitative research techniques:

Experiment

A research hypothesis is commonly tested using an experiment, which involves the creation of a controlled environment where the variables are maneuvered. Aside from determining the cause and effect, this method helps in knowing testing outcomes, such as when altering or removing variables.

Traditionally, experimental, laboratory-based research is used to advance knowledge in the physical and life sciences, including psychology. In recent decades, more and more social scientists are also adopting lab experiments (Falk & Heckman, 2009).

Survey

Survey research is designed to generate statistical data about a target audience (Fowler, 2014). Surveys can involve large, medium, or small populations and can either be a one-time event or a continuing process

Governments across the world are among the heavy users of continuing surveys, such as for census of populations or labor force surveys. This is a quantitative method that uses predetermined sets of closed questions that are easy to answer, thus enabling the gathering and analysis of large data sets.

In the past, surveys used to be expensive and time-consuming. But with the advancement in technology, new survey tools like social media and emails have made this research method easier and cheaper.

Causal-Comparative research

This method leverages the strength of comparison. It is primarily utilized to determine the cause and effect relationship among variables (Schenker & Rumrill, 2004).

For instance, a causal-comparative study measured the productivity of employees in an organization that allows remote work setup and compared that to the staff of another organization that does not offer work from home arrangements.

Cross-sectional research

While the observation method considers study subjects at a given point in time, cross-sectional research focuses on the similarity in all variables except the one being studied.

This type does not allow for the determination of cause-effect relationships since subjects are now observed continuously. A cross-sectional study is often followed by longitudinal research to determine the precise causes. It is used mainly by pharmaceutical firms and retailers.

Longitudinal study

A longitudinal method of research is used for understanding the traits or behavior of a subject under observation after repeatedly testing the subject over a certain period of time. Data collected using this method can be qualitative or quantitative in nature.

A commonly-used form of longitudinal research is the cohort study. For instance, in 1951, a cohort study called the British Doctors Study (Doll et al., 2004) was initiated, which compared smokers and non-smokers in the UK. The study continued through 2001. As early as 1956, the study gave undeniable proof of the direct link between smoking and the incidence of lung cancer.

Correlational research

This method is used to determine the relationships and prevalence among variables (Curtis et al., 2016). It commonly employs regression as the statistical treatment for predicting the study’s outcomes, which can only be a negative, neutral, or positive correlation.

A classic example of empirical research with correlational research is when studying if high education helps in obtaining better-paying jobs. If outcomes indicate that higher education does allow individuals to have high-salaried jobs, then it follows that people with less education tend to have lower-paying jobs.

V. Steps for Conducting Empirical Research

Since empirical research is based on observation and capturing experiences, it is important to plan the steps to conduct the experiment and how to analyze it. This will enable the researcher to resolve problems or obstacles, which can occur during the experiment.

Step #1: Establishing the research objective

In this initial step, the researcher must be clear about what he or she precisely wants to do in the study. He or she should likewise frame the problem statement, plans of action, and determine any potential issues with the available resources, schedule, etc. for the research.

Most importantly, the researcher must be able to ascertain whether the study will be more beneficial than the cost it will incur.

Step #2: Reviewing relevant literature and supporting theories

The researcher must determine relevant theories or models to his or her research problem. If there are any such theories or models, they must understand how it can help in supporting the study outcomes.

Relevant literature must also be consulted. The researcher must be able to identify previous studies that examined similar problems or subjects, as well as determine the issues encountered.

Step #3: Framing the hypothesis and measurement

The researcher must frame an initial hypothesis or educated guess that could be the likely outcome. Variables must be established, along with the research context.

Units of measurements should also be defined, including the allowable margin of errors. The researcher must determine if the selected measures will be accepted by other scholars.

Step #4: Defining the research design, methodology, and data collection techniques

Before proceeding with the study, the researcher must establish an appropriate approach for the research. He or she must organize experiments to gather data that will allow him or her to frame the hypothesis.

The researcher should also decide whether he or she will use a nonexperimental or experimental technique to perform the study. Likewise, the type of research design will depend on the type of study being conducted.

Finally, the researcher must determine the parameters that will influence the validity of the research design. Data gathering must be performed by selecting suitable samples based on the research question. After gathering the empirical data, the analysis follows.

Step #5: Conducting data analysis and framing the results

Data analysis is done either quantitatively or qualitatively. Depending on the nature of the study, the researcher must determine which method of data analysis is the appropriate one, or whether a combination of the two is suitable.

The outcomes of this step determine if the hypothesis is supported or rejected. This is why data analysis is considered as one of the most crucial steps in any research undertaking.

Step #6: Making conclusions

A report must be prepared in that it presents the findings and the entire research proceeding. If the researcher intends to disseminate his or her findings to a wider audience, the report will be converted into an article for publication. Aside from including the typical parts from the introduction and literature view, up to the methods, analysis, and conclusions, the researcher should also make recommendations for further research on his or her topic.

To ensure the originality and credibility of the report or research, it is essential to employ a plagiarism checker. By using a reliable plagiarism checker, the researcher can verify the uniqueness of their work and avoid any unintentional instances of plagiarism. This step helps maintain the integrity of the research and ensures that the recommendations for further research are based on the researcher’s own original insights. Incorporating a plagiarism checker into the writing process provides an additional layer of assurance and professionalism, enhancing the impact of the report or article in the academic community. Educators can also check the originality of their students’ research by utilizing a free plagiarism checker for teachers.

VI. Empirical Research Cycle

The empirical research cycle is composed of five phases, with each one considered as important as the next phase (de Groot, 1969). This rigorous and systematic method can consistently capture the process of framing hypotheses on how certain subjects behave or function and then testing them versus empirical data. It is considered to typify the deductive approach to science.

These are the five phases of the empirical research cycle:

1. Observation

During this initial phase, an idea is triggered for presenting a hypothesis. It involves the use of observation to gather empirical data. For example:

: "Consumers tend to consult first their smartphones before buying something in-store.
"

2. Induction

Inductive reasoning is then conducted to frame a general conclusion from the data gathered through observation. For example:

: "As mentioned earlier, most consumers tend to consult first their smartphones before buying something in-store.
"

A researcher may pose the question, “Does the tendency to use a smartphone indicate that today’s consumers need to be informed before making purchasing decisions?" The researcher can assume that is the case. Nonetheless, since it is still just a supposition, an experiment must be conducted to support or reject this hypothesis.

The researcher decided to conduct an online survey to inquire about the buying habits of a certain sample population of buyers at brick-and-mortar stores. This is to determine whether people always look at their smartphones first before making a purchase.

3. Deduction

This phase enables the researcher to figure out a conclusion out of the experiment. This must be based on rationality and logic in order to arrive at particular, unbiased outcomes. For example:

: "In the experiment, if a shopper consults first his or her smartphone before buying in-store, then it can be concluded that the shopper needs information to help him or her make informed buying decisions.
"

4. Testing

This phase involves the researcher going back to the empirical research steps to test the hypothesis. There is now the need to analyze and validate the data using appropriate statistical methods.

If the researcher confirms that in-store shoppers do consult their smartphones for product information before making a purchase, the researcher has found support for the hypothesis. However, it should be noted that this is just support of the hypothesis, not proof of a reality.

5. Evaluation

This phase is often neglected by many but is actually a crucial step to help keep expanding knowledge. During this stage, the researcher presents the gathered data, the supporting contention/s, and conclusions.

The researcher likewise puts forth the limitations of the study and his hypothesis. In addition, the researcher makes recommendations for further studies on the same topic with expanded variables.

VII. Advantages and Disadvantages of Empirical Research

Advantages

Since the time of the ancient Greeks, empirical research had been providing the world with numerous benefits. The following are a few of them:

Empirical research is used to validate previous research findings and frameworks.
It assumes a critical role in enhancing internal validity.
The degree of control is high, which enables the researcher to manage numerous variables.
It allows a researcher to comprehend the progressive changes that can occur, and thus enables him to modify an approach when needed.
Being based on facts and experience makes a research project more authentic and competent.

Disadvantages

Despite the many benefits it brings, empirical research is far from perfect. The following are some of its drawbacks:

Being evidence-based, data collection is a common problem especially when the research involves different sources and multiple methods.
It can be time-consuming, especially for longitudinal research.
Requesting permission to perform certain methods can be difficult, especially when a study involves human subjects.
Conducting research in multiple locations can be very expensive.
The propensity of even seasoned researchers to incorrectly interpret the statistical significance. For instance, Amrhein et al. (2019) made an analysis of 791 articles from five journals and found that half incorrectly interpreted that non-significance indicates zero effect.

VIII. Samples of Empirical Research

There are many types of empirical research. And, they can take many formsfrom basic research to action research like community project efforts. Here are some notable empirical research examples:

Professional Research

Student Research

XI. Ethical Considerations in Empirical Research

Ethical considerations are critical in empirical research to protect participants and the integrity of the findings. Researchers must follow strict ethical guidelines to avoid harm, maintain privacy, and uphold transparency. Here are the key ethical considerations:

Informed Consent

Participants must give their informed consent before participating in a study. Researchers must clearly explain the purpose, methods, risks, and benefits to ensure that participants fully understand and voluntarily agree to participate.

Confidentiality and Privacy

Protecting participants' privacy is essential in empirical research. Researchers must anonymize data and ensure that personal information is not disclosed without consent, safeguarding individuals from potential harm or exploitation.

Avoiding Harm

Researchers are ethically obligated to minimize the risk of physical, emotional, or psychological harm. Studies should be designed to avoid causing distress. If risks exist, they should be clearly communicated to participants in advance.

Transparency and Honesty

Transparency in reporting findings and honesty in data collection are vital for maintaining the integrity of research. Researchers should avoid fabricating or manipulating data and must disclose any conflicts of interest that might bias their findings.

Right to Withdraw

Participants should have the right to withdraw from the study at any time without facing any penalties. This ensures that their participation is voluntary throughout the research process, respecting their autonomy and personal choice.

Applications of Empirical Research in Emerging Technologies and Modern Challenges

Bridging Theory with Practice

Empirical research serves as a cornerstone for solving real-world problems by providing evidence-based insights. Its applications span various domains, driving innovation and informing decisions in addressing modern challenges. Below are key areas where empirical research plays a transformative role:

1. Advancing Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Empirical research underpins the development of AI algorithms by analyzing vast datasets to identify patterns, validate models, and optimize performance. Through iterative testing and validation, researchers ensure AI systems are reliable and applicable across industries.

Example: Autonomous vehicle development relies on empirical data from simulations and real-world driving to enhance decision-making algorithms and ensure passenger safety.

2. Tackling Climate Change

Empirical studies are critical in understanding and mitigating climate change. By gathering data on greenhouse gas emissions, temperature fluctuations, and biodiversity loss, researchers create predictive models and propose actionable solutions.

Example: Longitudinal studies on ice melt rates in polar regions help policymakers craft strategies to combat rising sea levels.

3. Addressing Global Health Crises

From infectious diseases to mental health, empirical research provides the foundation for evidence-based medical practices. It informs drug development, evaluates public health interventions, and enhances patient care strategies.

Example: During the COVID-19 pandemic, empirical research facilitated the rapid development and testing of vaccines, saving millions of lives.

4. Enhancing Economic Policies

Empirical methods guide economic decisions by analyzing market trends, consumer behavior, and policy impacts. This data-driven approach helps governments and organizations address inequalities and foster sustainable growth.

Example: Correlational research on unemployment rates and inflation aids central banks in setting monetary policies.

5. Improving Education Systems

Empirical studies in education assess teaching methods, learning outcomes, and policy reforms. By identifying effective strategies, researchers contribute to shaping inclusive and adaptive education systems.

Example: Studies on remote learning during the pandemic revealed key factors influencing student engagement and success.

6. Promoting Sustainable Development

Empirical research informs sustainable practices by analyzing the impact of human activities on the environment and resources. It guides industries in adopting eco-friendly technologies and minimizing ecological footprints.

Example: Empirical data from energy consumption studies supports the transition to renewable energy sources.

How Can Empirical Research Skills Enhance Career Growth?

Empirical research skills empower professionals to excel in data-driven environments by cultivating advanced analytic, critical thinking, and problem-solving proficiencies. These capabilities facilitate the design of rigorous studies, enable precise data interpretation, and support informed decision-making, which are essential in today’s competitive job market. By mastering the empirical method, professionals can distinguish themselves in various sectors—ranging from healthcare and technology to public policy and finance—where evidence-based strategies drive innovation and operational success. This expertise not only broadens career prospects but also opens pathways to roles offering high paying certificate jobs, further validating the value of specialized, research-oriented training.

How Can You Critically Evaluate Empirical Research?

To ensure research findings are both credible and applicable, it is essential to assess the study’s design, methodology, and data interpretation. A critical evaluation examines whether the sampling methods, statistical analyses, and transparency in reporting allow for reproducibility. This involves checking for potential biases, verifying the adequacy of control variables, and ensuring that conclusions are firmly supported by the presented evidence. Researchers and practitioners alike can improve their proficiency in evaluating studies by engaging with professional development opportunities, such as 6-month certificate programs that pay well, which emphasize rigorous analytical frameworks and current best practices.

How Can Empirical Research Ensure Reproducibility and Reliability?

Empirical research builds authority when its findings are reproducible and reliably interpreted. Researchers can strengthen reproducibility by adopting rigorous protocols such as pre-registration of study designs, comprehensive documentation of procedures, and adherence to standardized measurement techniques. Implementing transparent data practices—like providing open access to datasets and detailed methodological appendices—further allows peers to validate and extend the findings. Quality control measures, including replication and independent verification, are essential to mitigate biases and improve the scientific community's trust. Additionally, continuous professional development in research ethics and methodology is crucial for maintaining high standards. Scholars are encouraged to explore pathways that combine methodological rigor with professional advancement, similar to choosing the best degree programs that lead to 100k salary to ensure sustained career growth while upholding the integrity of empirical inquiry.

Can Short-Term Online Degrees Bolster Empirical Research Skills?

Empirical research thrives on a strong methodological foundation and practical exposure that can be efficiently acquired through accelerated online academic programs. Short-term degrees offer a focused curriculum designed to equip students with modern data analysis techniques and hands-on application of empirical methods, fostering immediate integration of theory into practice. These programs emphasize critical thinking, adaptive problem solving, and digital literacy, which are indispensable in today’s evolving research landscape. For instance, candidates can explore a streamlined learning pathway provided by the 6 month associate degree online to gain targeted expertise and practical skills that drive empirical inquiry and support career advancement.

How Can Emerging Digital Tools and Interdisciplinary Approaches Enhance Empirical Research?

Advances in digital technology and interdisciplinary collaboration are increasingly transforming empirical research methodologies. Modern computational tools and data analytics software enhance the accuracy and reproducibility of experiments while enabling researchers to integrate diverse datasets and theoretical perspectives. This integration supports nuanced analyses that bridge gaps across disciplines, leading to more robust conclusions. Leveraging these innovations requires professionals to continuously update their expertise through adaptive learning strategies, including pursuing online degree programs tailored to emerging digital competencies and interdisciplinary research practices.

How Can Empirical Research Influence Evidence-Based Policymaking?

Empirical research serves as a cornerstone for developing robust, evidence-based policies by transforming rigorous data collection and analysis into actionable insights. High-quality studies provide policymakers with transparent and reproducible findings, which increase public trust and foster collaborative decision-making among stakeholders. In this framework, integrating interdisciplinary approaches and ensuring methodological rigor—notably through advanced digital analytics and stakeholder engagement—enhances the translation of research outcomes into practical legislative and administrative actions. Furthermore, academic pathways such as pursuing the cheapest doctoral programs online are instrumental in preparing future experts who can bridge scientific evidence with policy formulation, thereby sustaining long-term societal benefits.

Enhancing Accessibility in Empirical Research Through Online Learning

One notable avenue that aligns with the principles of empirical research is the increasing focus on accessibility in education, particularly in advanced academic programs. As professionals and educators seek affordable and flexible means to advance their expertise, online learning platforms have gained significant traction for their empirically supported benefits, such as improved retention and flexibility.

For example, many educators and researchers striving to deepen their pedagogical competencies are turning to the cheapest EDD programs available online. These programs not only provide cost-effective solutions but are also grounded in evidence-based teaching practices, ensuring that graduates are well-equipped to apply empirical methodologies in educational settings.

Moreover, studies suggest that online learning environments foster diverse participation, offering access to individuals from various geographical and socio-economic backgrounds. This democratization of education allows more scholars to engage in empirical research, ultimately enriching the global academic community with varied insights and perspectives. For those considering an advanced degree, exploring affordable online options might be a critical step in balancing educational aspirations with financial responsibility.

What Are the Limitations and Future Directions in Empirical Research?

Empirical research, despite its rigorous approach, encounters inherent limitations such as sample biases, restricted generalizability, and challenges in replicability due to evolving technologies and changing data landscapes. To mitigate these issues, researchers are increasingly adopting innovative statistical techniques, enhancing transparency in methodological reporting, and incorporating interdisciplinary perspectives that address contextual nuances. Future directions include leveraging big data analytics, expanding cross-sector collaborations, and integrating advanced digital tools to further refine data collection and interpretation methods. Strengthening educational foundations—such as pursuing an accelerated bachelor's degree online—can also equip emerging scholars with the adaptive skills necessary to navigate these complexities and drive the next wave of empirical innovation.

Conclusion

Since ancient times until today, empirical research remains one of the most useful tools in man’s collective endeavor to unlock life’s mysteries. Using meaningful experience and observable evidence, this type of research will continue helping validate myriad hypotheses, test theoretical models, and advance various fields of specialization.

With new forms of deadly diseases and other problems continuing to plague man’s existence, finding effective medical interventions and relevant solutions had never been more important. This is among the reasons why empirical research had assumed a more prominent role in today’s society.

This article was able to discuss the different empirical research methods, the steps for conducting empirical research, the empirical research cycle, and notable examples. All of these contribute to supporting the larger societal cause to help understand how the world really works and make it a better place. Furthermore, being factually accurate is a big part of the criteria of good research, and it serves as the heart of empirical research.

Key Insights

Definition of Empirical Research: Empirical research is based on verifiable evidence derived from observation and experimentation, aiming to understand how the world works.
Origins: The concept of empirical research dates back to ancient Greek medical practitioners who relied on observed phenomena rather than dogmatic principles.
Types and Methods: Empirical research can be qualitative (e.g., interviews, case studies) or quantitative (e.g., surveys, experiments), depending on the nature of the data collected and the research question.
Empirical Research Cycle: Consists of observation, induction, deduction, testing, and evaluation, forming a systematic approach to generating and testing hypotheses.
Steps in Conducting Empirical Research: Includes establishing objectives, reviewing literature, framing hypotheses, designing methodology, collecting data, analyzing data, and making conclusions.
Advantages: Empirical research validates previous findings, enhances internal validity, allows for high control over variables, and is fact-based, making it authentic and competent.
Disadvantages: Data collection can be challenging and time-consuming, especially in longitudinal studies, and interpreting statistical significance can be problematic.
Applications: Used across various fields such as IT, infectious diseases, occupational health, environmental science, and economics. It is also prevalent in student research for theses and dissertations.

FAQ

What is the primary goal of empirical research? The primary goal of empirical research is to generate knowledge about how the world works by relying on verifiable evidence obtained through observation and experimentation.
How does empirical research differ from theoretical research? Empirical research is based on observable and measurable evidence, while theoretical research involves abstract ideas and concepts without necessarily relying on real-world data.
What are the main types of empirical research methods? The main types of empirical research methods are qualitative (e.g., interviews, case studies, focus groups) and quantitative (e.g., surveys, experiments, cross-sectional studies).
Why is the empirical research cycle important? The empirical research cycle is important because it provides a structured and systematic approach to generating and testing hypotheses, ensuring that the research is thorough and reliable.
What are the steps involved in conducting empirical research? The steps involved in conducting empirical research include establishing the research objective, reviewing relevant literature, framing hypotheses, defining research design and methodology, collecting data, analyzing data, and making conclusions.
What are the advantages of empirical research? The advantages of empirical research include validating previous findings, enhancing internal validity, allowing for high control over variables, and being based on facts and experiences, making the research authentic and competent.
What are some common challenges in conducting empirical research? Common challenges in conducting empirical research include difficulties in data collection, time-consuming processes, obtaining permissions for certain methods, high costs, and potential misinterpretation of statistical significance.
In which fields is empirical research commonly used? Empirical research is commonly used in fields such as information technology, infectious diseases, occupational health, environmental science, economics, and various academic disciplines for student theses and dissertations.
Can empirical research use both qualitative and quantitative methods? Yes, empirical research can use both qualitative and quantitative methods, often combining them to provide a comprehensive understanding of the research problem.
What role does empirical research play in modern society? Empirical research plays a crucial role in modern society by validating hypotheses, testing theoretical models, and advancing knowledge across various fields, ultimately contributing to solving complex problems and improving the quality of life.

References

Abbott, B., Abbott, R., Abbott, T., Abernathy, M., & Acernese, F. (2016). Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Physical Review Letters, 116 (6), 061102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102
Akpinar, E. (2014). Consumer Information Sharing: Understanding Psychological Drivers of Social Transmission. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/1
Altmetric (2020). The 2019 Altmetric top 100. Altmetric.
Amrhein, V., Greenland, S., & McShane, B. (2019). Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature, 567, 305-307. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9
Amrhein, V., Trafimow, D., & Greenland, S. (2019). Inferential statistics as descriptive statistics: There is no replication crisis if we don’t expect replication. The American Statistician, 73, 262-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1543137
Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R. et al. (2019). Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature, 574, 505510. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5
Bhattacharya, H. (2008). Empirical Research. In L. M. Given (ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 254-255. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n133
Cohn, A., Maréchal, M., Tannenbaum, D., & Zund, C. (2019). Civic honesty around the globe. Science, 365 (6448), 70-73. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau8712
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. ISBN 978-1-4129-9746-1
Crew, B. (2019, August 2). Google Scholar reveals its most influential papers for 2019. Nature Index.
Curtis, E., Comiskey, C., & Dempsey, O. (2016). Importance and use of correlational research. Nurse Researcher, 23 (6), 20-25. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2016.e1382
Dashti, H., Jones, S., Wood, A., Lane, J., & van Hees, V., et al. (2019). Genome-wide association study identifies genetic loci for self-reported habitual sleep duration supported by accelerometer-derived estimates. Nature Communications, 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08917-4
de Groot, A.D. (1969). Methodology: foundations of inference and research in the behavioral sciences. In Psychological Studies, 6. The Hague & Paris: Mouton & Co. Google Books
Doll, R., Peto, R., Boreham, J., & Isabelle Sutherland, I. (2004). Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years’ observations on male British doctors. BMJ, 328 (7455), 1519-33. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38142.554479.AE
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. Google Books
Falk, A., & Heckman, J. (2009). Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science, 326 (5952), pp. 535-538. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168244
Fowler, F.J. (2014). Survey Research Methods, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. WorldCat
Gabriel, A., Manalo, M., Feliciano, R., Garcia, N., Dollete, U., & Paler J. (2018). A Candida parapsilosis inactivation-based UV-C process for calamansi (Citrus microcarpa) juice frink. LWT Food Science and Technology, 90, 157-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.12.020
Gallus, S., Bosetti, C., Negri, E., Talamini, R., Montella, M., et al. (2003). Does pizza protect against cancer? International Journal of Cancer, 107 (2), pp. 283-284. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.11382
Ganna, A., Verweij, K., Nivard, M., Maier, R., & Wedow, R. (2019). Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior. Science, 365 (6456). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat7693
Gedik, H., Voss, T., & Voss, A. (2013). Money and Transmission of Bacteria. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, 2 (2). https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-2-22
Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., Kernan, M. C., Becker, T. E., & Eisenberger, R. (2018). Defeating abusive supervision: Training supervisors to support subordinates. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23 (2), 151-162. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000061
Google (2020). The 2019 Google Scholar Metrics Ranking. Google Scholar
Greenberg, D., Warrier, V., Allison, C., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2018). Testing the Empathizing-Systemising theory of sex differences and the Extreme Male Brain theory of autism in half a million people. PNAS, 115 (48), 12152-12157. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811032115
Grullon, D. (2019). Disentangling time constant and time-dependent hidden state in time series with variational Bayesian inference. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124572
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 770-778. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90
Hviid, A., Hansen, J., Frisch, M., & Melbye, M. (2019). Measles, mumps, rubella vaccination, and autism: A nationwide cohort study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 170 (8), 513-520. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-2101
Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, 5 (4), 87-88. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141942
Jamshidnejad, A. (2017). Efficient Predictive Model-Based and Fuzzy Control for Green Urban Mobility. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands. DUT
Kamberelis, G., & Dimitriadis, G. (2011). Focus groups: Contingent articulations of pedagogy, politics, and inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 545-562). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. ISBN 978-1-4129-7417-2
Knowles-Smith, A. (2017). Refugees and theatre: an exploration of the basis of self-representation. (Unpublished undergraduate thesis). University College London, London, UK. UCL
Kulp, S.A., & Strauss, B.H. (2019). New elevation data triple estimates of global vulnerability to sea-level rise and coastal flooding. Nature Communications, 10 (4844), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12808-z
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521, 436444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suarez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73 (1), 26-46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015). Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 3431-3440. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298965
Martindell, N. (2014). DCDN: Distributed content delivery for the modern web. (Unpublished undergraduate thesis). University of Washington, Seattle, WA. CSE-UW
Mora, T. (2019). Transforming Parking Garages Into Affordable Housing. (Unpublished undergraduate thesis). University of Arkansas-Fayetteville, Fayetteville, AK. UARK
Ng, M., Fleming, T., Robinson, M., Thomson, B., & Graetz, N. (2014). Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 19802013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet, 384 (9945), 766-781. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8
Ogden, C., Carroll, M., Kit, B., & Flegal, K. (2014). Prevalence of Childhood and Adult Obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. JAMA, 311 (8), 806-14. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.732
Powner, L. (2015). Empirical Research and Writing: A Political Science Student’s Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1-19. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483395906
Ripple, W., Wolf, C., Newsome, T., Barnard, P., & Moomaw, W. (2020). World scientists’ warning of a climate emergency. BioScience, 70 (1), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz088
Schenker, J., & Rumrill, P. (2004). Causal-comparative research designs. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 21 (3), 117-121.
Shereen, M., Khan, S., Kazmi, A., Bashir, N., & Siddique, R. (2020). COVID-19 infection: Origin, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruses. Journal of Advanced Research, 24, 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2020.03.005
Sipola, C. (2017). Summarizing electricity usage with a neural network. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland. Project-Archive
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015). Going deeper with convolutions. 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594
Taylor, S. (2017). Effacing and Obscuring Autonomy: the Effects of Structural Violence on the Transition to Adulthood of Street Involved Youth. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. UOttawa
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359 (6380), 1146-1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559