Types of Research Design for 2025: Perspective and Methodological Approaches

by Imed Bouchrika, Phd

Co-Founder and Chief Data Scientist

Share

How do you go about conducting research? According to Saunders, et al. (2012), the definition of research design is a plan aimed at answering a specific research question. This research design definition concerns proper research data management and brings together several components, strategies, and methods to collect data and analyze it. However, Bliesmer (1970) has said that designing research may fail to account for flexibility and the duration of the research.

In this article, we’ll look at research design examples, the different types, and which particular field of study they are most suited to. We then outline an action plan to help enable readers to write a design plan of their own that is appropriate for a specific study, with the intention of making the design as comprehensive as possible.

Types of Research Design Table of Contents

1. Overview of Research Design
2. Characteristics of Good Research Design
3. Basic Research Design Methods
4. Research Design Types
5. Research Design Approaches
6. Ethical Considerations in Research Design
7. Emerging Trends in Research Design: Adapting to 2025 and Beyond
8. How Does Your Academic Major Influence Research Design Outcomes?
9. Enhancing Research Design for Career Advancement
10. How Can Accelerated Degree Programs Enhance Research Design?
11. How Can Short-Term Certifications Bolster Practical Research Design Skills?
12. What Are the Common Pitfalls in Research Design and How Can They Be Overcome?
13. How Do You Assess the Effectiveness of Your Research Design?

1. Overview of Research Design

What is research design in a research paper? A research design also called a research strategy, is a plan to answer a set of questions (McCombes, 2019). It is a framework that includes the methods and procedures to collect, analyze, and interpret data. In other words, the research design describes how the researcher will investigate the central problem of the research and is, thus part of the research proposal.

The characteristics of research design influence the type of data to be gathered and, consequently, its results. Depending on the type, which we will explain below, research design also defines all other constituent parts of a study, such as variables, hypotheses, experiments, methodology, and statistical analysis (Creswell et al., 2018).

However, what is research design in research methodology? Many people confuse research design and methodology. The difference is that while the former is an outline of how to approach the problem, the latter states how to implement the design. Both are crucial in building a thesis statement. And, if you need help with this part of your study, you can check out our guide on how to write a thesis statement for a research paper.

Goals

Excellent research design has one purpose: to make the data address the research problem as clearly, as accurately, and as unbiased as possible. Arriving at the results means successfully specifying the type of results to test a theory or evaluate or describe a phenomenon. Without doing this beforehand, interpreting data will appear weak and flimsy and will likely not address the problem the researcher has set out to answer.

In any research work, design is rudimentary since everything eventually emanates from the selected design, and since this selection is the most closely related to the scholar’s theories and research questions (Vogt et al., 2012). With the right choice, research design has fulfilled its purpose when the conclusion is seen to have a minimum bias. A research design that produces the least margin of error is one of its goals.

To do so, sound research design follows these main tenets:

• Identify the problem.
• Justify why it is a problem.
• Review literature surrounding the problem.
• Specify hypotheses regarding the problem.
• Describe the data to test the hypotheses and how it will be collected.
• Define how this data will be interpreted and analyzed to find out if the hypotheses are true or false.

2. Characteristics of Good Research Design

de Vaus (2001) uses construction as an analogy for research design. Before constructing any building, knowing whether a builder needs a high-rise, a factory, a school, or any type of building is essential. Therefore, knowing the type and the characteristics of the research goes first naturally, before even beginning to pose the hypotheses and the methods used to collect data that, in turn, can support or abrogate the hypotheses. This approach is also very useful when writing your university dissertation.

The determination you make during the framing of the research design process will significantly dictate the value of the conclusions you can derive from your study outcomes (Bordens & Abbott, 2018). As such, ensure that your selected research design is highly appropriate because with the right choice comes the relevant results.

While the length and complexity of the research design vary, the research design itself consists of several parts. Note that the research problem will dictate the research design, including its type and its elements. These parts are:

1. Purpose statement (the central research problem)
2. Data collection and analysis
3. Statistical method to analyze data
4. Settings for the study
5. Timeline
6. Probable objections
7. Validating the data

The statistical methods to analyze such data can take on different forms and depend on the research’s central question. The chart illustrates which method is mostly used in the context of market research:

What Makes a Good Research Design?

There are several ways to see that the study is designed well at a glance. Here are four main characteristics that make for good research design:

• It is neutral. Naturally, setting up a study comes with a measure of assumptions, which is why there is a hypothesis. However, good research design comes into play when the results obtained are as neutral and as objective as possible. It should allow the researcher to analyze and interpret the data that is free of any bias.
• It is valid. The design of the research also indicates the tools and techniques by which to measure results. If the design is sound, these tools will be correct and appropriate for the job, which will be defined as those that can help a researcher in measuring the results.
• It is reliable. Research design, when done well, can afford research that generates similar results every time it is performed. This means that a good research design creates an opportunity to form standards to collect and analyze results.
• It can be generalized. Generalized design means the design can apply not just to one part of a study, population, or setting. It should be able to cover any part with the same measure of accuracy.

These four elements, including how the research is designed, influence how the research will be conducted and the methods used to acquire the results.

3. Basic Research Design Methods

Research methods are used to answer different questions, and examples of research questions can help guide the selection of appropriate methods. These methods are highly dependent upon the type of research design used to “frame" the entire study. Because they are so closely related, research methods are somewhat conflated with research design, but the subtle nuance is there. Yin (2014) has a succinct way of differentiating the two: design is logical, while method is logistical. In other words, the design is the plan, the method is how to realize that plan.

There are important factors at play when creating a methodology in research. These include ethics, the validity of data, and reliability. Accounting for the time spent on collecting and analyzing data is also a prudent move. The type of research method will also factor into the time; for example, interviews or observation may yield rich data sets, but they take much more time than, say, a survey. Therefore, balancing these needs with the time and resources available and the advantages and disadvantages of each method will be paramount to designing a research method.

Types of Research Methods

Alzheimer Europe (2009) outlines eight types of research design in research methodology methods, but other disciplines may demand more specialized ones. That said, the biggest contributor to the type of method will depend on the goals of the study. In the social sciences, for example, this may depend on the subject/s or the central problem, such as what makes people buy expensive designer clothing more than their more affordable counterparts.

The following methods, however, can be used in any field or body of knowledge:

• Experiments
• Surveys
• Interviews
• Questionnaires
• Case studies
• Observational trials (using longitudinal and retrospective approaches)
• Delphi method in which panelists share, through several rounds, assessments of salient issues in order to forecast a hypothesis, especially in areas where knowledge is uncertain and imperfect (Aichholzer, 2009).

Note that the research does not have to be pigeonholed into one particular type of method. Depending on the resources and the research design, the research team can combine several types of methods to find the data they need. In addition, the data generated from one method will be markedly different from that of another, both in quality and quantity.

4. Research Design Types

The type of research design is one of the biggest contributors to the quality, relevance, and accuracy of a result. Therefore, before setting out to outline a proposal, it is always a good idea to distinguish the type of research by including it in the research design.

There are a few ways to approach a research design type, but literature has not always been clear-cut on these types (Abutabenjeh, 2018). In fact, existing publications have made it even impossible to distinguish between types, methods, and approaches, with some older references talking about fixed and flexible designs (Bouma, 1994).

To make designing research as simple as possible, we have broken down the types of research design into four major ones, as explained below.

Descriptive Research

In studies where the researcher is interested in describing a case, situation, or phenomenon, they are acting under a descriptive research design. As a theory-based design, it is interested in answering the how, what, when, and where questions, instead of the why. Descriptive research directs the researcher to understand the research problem before investigating why it even happens in the first place.

Descriptive design furnishes the researcher with an opportunity to gain insight into the problem itself. It also helps the research team to see the need for the research. If it is not as clear or as necessary, exploratory research (which, according to Blaikie (2000), is considered as the first phase of research) may be needed. Descriptive research attempts to build on the groundwork made by exploration, such as providing additional information, filling in gaps in knowledge, or expanding it. Unique to descriptive research is that it also aims to collect as much data and information as possible.

An example of descriptive research is market research. An investor, for example, may need to look at the market, such as its current state, its trends, and so on. Descriptive research can answer all these questions for the investor, which is why market research is an investment in itself, as evidenced by the following graphic.

Experimental Research

Using an experiment, the research attempts to establish a cause-and-effect relationship in a situation or phenomenon. It is a causal research design type where the researcher tries to observe the impact of a variable on a dependent one. In doing so, the researcher attempts to determine or predict what may occur based on experimental models (Anastas, 1999).

In the example above, experimental research entails the investor modifying a variable to look at how such a change affects other factors, such as price.

Experimental research is a practical route to take, as it allows the researcher to find exactly what is working and what is not, and account for these changes accordingly to solve the research problem. Experiments are often used in the social sciences and in the medical field by grouping people, such as by using a control group as an independent variable.

Correlational Research

Like experimental research, correlational research aims to establish a relationship between two variables. The difference is that while experimental research tries to monitor changes between variables (causal), correlational research tries to look for associations and similarities between them (Sassower, 2017).

As a non-experimental technique, it instead relies on evaluating the relationship between these variables using statistical analysis. To calculate the amount of correlation between two variables, a statistical method called Pearson’s correlation coefficient is used (Mukaka, 2012), which is a value between -1 and +1. The more it leans toward a positive value, there is indeed a relationship between the two. A negative value denotes the variables are related but indirectly proportional, and zero denotes no relationship.

Explanatory Research

As evidenced by the name, explanatory research aims to explain the researcher’s findings and ideas to expand the theory. Using this research design, the researchers explore the limits and boundaries of a subject in order to present the reader with the results that answer the what, how, and why of the research’s central thesis. When conducting the research, the researcher should leave all biases behind and adapt to new data and/or findings.

Researchers and students conduct explanatory research to find the underlying problem or a new angle to a problem. These may not always be readily apparent when initially proposing the research or it was not studied in-depth before (GradesFixer, 2019).

Note that explanatory research does not seek to provide conclusive answers, but to give an avenue to researchers to plumb the depths of the subject.

5. Research Design Approaches

Any researcher would need an understanding of the research design types to see which is more appropriate for the study or which one brings to fruition the most accurate results. To do this, there are three broad ways to approach the design, as we will discuss below.

Quantitative

The first approach is to design the research using a quantitative perspective. This approach best suits a research goal where actionable insight is tied to a statistical conclusion. As the name implies, the quantitative approach frames numbers as a representation of data. Because numbers are objective, a quantitative approach is necessary, for example, in making data-driven business decisions where margins of profits turn on the most minute of details and/or figures.

Often called a “top-down" approach (Burney, 2008), it involves taking away the parts from the general to the specific. This way, the researchers arrive at a conclusion based on the premises or the available facts. Because quantitative data also tend to be voluminous, statistical software and other services are used to analyze them, the most popular of which are illustrated below.

Objectivity is highly prized in a quantitative approach to research. As a result, researchers go to great lengths so that the results of their research are untarnished by their own presence, behavior, or expectations. One such way to do so is by self-examination such that their methods or conclusions are free of unwarranted biases or presumptions. A quantitative approach to research must mean that the design itself must account for and/or control external variables; they can never be eliminated completely, and as such must be acknowledged in the interpretation of the findings. A basic example would be the process of registering a business name: check availability first to avoid duplicates, which impede the likelihood of achieving natural outcomes.

In order to approach a design with quantitative intent, researchers often start with one or more hypotheses and the relationships between the variables they want to investigate. The design must also factor in stricter forms of methodology and tools used to measure and validate the collected data, a clear plan of action, a statistical procedure to analyze data, and a valid way to present these results.

Qualitative

A qualitative approach, on the other hand, to research sets out to determine a relationship between collected data and observations. As it is about recording, analyzing, and discovering the web of interconnectedness that underpins related subjects, it generates a plethora of raw data, whether obtained through statistical means or otherwise. This nature of a qualitative approach thus lends itself well to exploratory research (Blaikie, 2009).

Unlike quantitative approaches, a qualitative approach is its opposite. It uses an inductive way of approaching the conclusion of the study. Also called a “bottom-up" approach, it infers meaning or looks for patterns on the basis of the data that they have collected.

Qualitative research is employed extensively in the social sciences. It is concerned with observing and uncovering the social constructs that human societies are framed in and looks at the significance of the human experience in the lens of beliefs, behaviors, and emotions. A qualitative approach is, thus interested in gaining an understanding of what works as the participant sees and feels it (that is, subjectively).

While qualitative research also uses some form of quantitative analysis, the way it collects data allows for greater freedom. Unlike quantitative methods that gather and collate data in computer-readable forms to be crunched at a later time, qualitative approaches record data in textual format from observation and interaction with the subjects. In addition, the methods used vary wildly, with open-ended, exploratory, and wide-ranging processes and little, if any, assumptions on the part of the researchers so as to make the data pristine and as accurate as possible.

Ultimately, quantitative and qualitative methods should not be considered as strict, divergent dichotomies, opposites, or categories. Rather, they should be seen as representing distinctive ends on a continuum or large system (Creswell, 2015). For instance, a research work tends to be more quantitative than qualitative or the other way around (Creswell & Creswell, 2018).

Pragmatic

Aristotle himself probably initiated the first pragmatic approach to research (Teddlie, 2008), though this is more of a proto-mixed method. A true pragmatic researcher, instead, uses any or both approaches to research design as fits the scope of the study and the questions it seeks to answer.

True to its name, the pragmatic approach cares nothing about which approach is better or in the philosophical ramifications of choosing one over the other. Instead, it uses the method that appears to best suit the task at hand. As a result, pragmatists use whatever tools, reasoning, and techniques that are appropriate to the situation without worrying over what kind of approach they are doing. Central to this idea is that they recognize that each approach has its attendant pros and cons, but they can be complementary as well.

Data that pragmatists collect this way are measured and analyzed using the appropriate manner (for example, a qualitative literature review is examined qualitatively, while a statistical survey is done quantitatively). The advantage, however, is that data can be converted between these two measures (especially qualitative to quantitative).

6. Ethical Considerations in Research Design

Ethical considerations are crucial in research design, ensuring that studies are conducted responsibly and with respect for participants. A strong ethical framework protects the rights and well-being of individuals involved. It enhances the credibility and integrity of the research itself. Here are vital ethical considerations to keep in mind:

• Informed Consent: Researchers must obtain informed consent from participants before involving them in a study. This means that participants should fully understand the research's nature, purpose, risks, and benefits. Clear information helps participants decide about their involvement, fostering trust and transparency.
• Confidentiality: Maintaining the confidentiality of participant data is essential. Researchers should take steps to protect personal information and ensure that it is not disclosed without consent. This can involve anonymizing data, securely storing information, and limiting access to only those directly involved in the research. Respecting confidentiality builds trust between researchers and participants.
• Minimizing Harm: Researchers must minimize any potential harm to participants, whether physical, psychological, or emotional. This includes assessing risks associated with the research design and implementing measures to mitigate them. Conducting a thorough risk-benefit analysis can help ensure that the potential benefits of the research outweigh any possible harm.
• Vulnerable Populations: Special ethical considerations apply when conducting research involving vulnerable populations, such as children, the elderly, or individuals with disabilities. Researchers must be particularly cautious and ensure that these individuals are not exploited or coerced into participating. Additional safeguards may be necessary to protect their rights and welfare.
• Debriefing Participants: After participation, researchers should offer debriefing sessions to inform participants about the study's purpose and findings. This helps participants understand their contribution and the overall significance of the research. Debriefing can also provide an opportunity to address participants' questions or concerns about their involvement.
• Research Misconduct: Researchers must avoid any form of misconduct, including fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. Upholding ethical standards in data collection, analysis, and reporting is vital for maintaining the integrity of the research process. Adhering to ethical guidelines can prevent breaches of trust between the research community and society.
• Compliance with Institutional Review Boards (IRBs): Most research involving human subjects requires approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or ethics committee. These bodies review research proposals to ensure ethical standards are met. Compliance with IRB guidelines helps protect participants and maintains the credibility of the research.

Researchers can create a responsible and trustworthy research environment by prioritizing ethical considerations in research design. These practices not only safeguard participants but also contribute to the overall validity and reliability of research findings, ultimately advancing knowledge responsibly.

7. Emerging Trends in Research Design: Adapting to 2025 and Beyond 

1. Data-Driven Research Design

With the exponential growth of big data, research designs are increasingly leveraging large-scale datasets for insights. Tools like machine learning and data analytics platforms enable researchers to:

• Identify patterns and correlations in complex datasets.
• Enhance the precision of quantitative and mixed-methods studies.
• Predict outcomes through advanced statistical modeling.

2. Integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

AI is transforming how researchers design studies by:

• Automating literature reviews using tools like Elicit and Research Rabbit.
• Enhancing survey designs through AI-driven question optimization.
• Facilitating data analysis with platforms like IBM SPSS and RStudio.

3. Sustainability and Ethical Considerations

As global challenges like climate change and inequality dominate research agendas, there is a shift toward designs that emphasize:

• Environmental sustainability, integrating frameworks like the United Nations' SDGs.
• Inclusive methodologies that prioritize underrepresented populations and voices.
• Enhanced ethical protocols to address the complexities of digital and cross-cultural research.

4. Interdisciplinary and Collaborative Approaches

Modern research problems often span multiple disciplines, necessitating:

• Collaborative designs that merge expertise from fields like biology, AI, and social sciences.
• Shared frameworks that accommodate diverse methodologies and epistemologies.
• Platforms like Slack, Trello, and Miro to facilitate cross-disciplinary communication.

5. Virtual and Remote Research Designs

The rise of remote technologies has reshaped traditional research practices, enabling:

• Virtual ethnography for social sciences, conducted through digital platforms.
• Remote experiments using tools like Prolific and Amazon Mechanical Turk.
• Longitudinal studies leveraging wearable tech and IoT devices for continuous data collection.

6. Adaptive and Agile Research Frameworks

In response to rapidly changing conditions, such as public health crises, research designs now prioritize:

• Real-time data collection and analysis for timely insights.
• Flexible methodologies that adapt to evolving hypotheses or external disruptions.
• Hybrid designs combining qualitative and quantitative approaches to ensure robustness.

Designing and Implementing an Actionable Research Design

As this article has explained, a research design is independent of any method or procedure for collecting data. By definition, any type of research can do so, and researchers can perform any type of approach as appropriate to the situation or the problem of the research. What research design aims to do is to create a direction or a blueprint of the research by recommending a framework of the inquiry. On the other hand, a question on how to find if a business name is taken does not require a research design because it is much simpler and easier to answer.

The design of the research thus enables researchers to identify the type of data collected and the evidence they need to answer the question. Simply collecting evidence to support a postulated hypothesis would not do; it is the task of the researcher, by designing a framework, to allow the study to find alternative, even conflicting explanations and which one makes more sense or can be most validated.

Scholars and researchers use a variety of research methods to collect and analyze information. To know more about these methods, read our article on primary and secondary research methods.

How Does Your Academic Major Influence Research Design Outcomes?

Selecting the right academic major can directly enhance your ability to develop comprehensive research designs. In fields where analytical and methodological rigor is emphasized, coursework and specialized projects foster skills that are critical for identifying pertinent research questions and curating robust methodologies. Tailoring your academic discipline to align with interdisciplinary trends helps streamline data analysis and problem-solving processes, ultimately strengthening the design framework. For those considering accessible academic entry points, exploring the easiest major in college options can provide an effective foundation for advanced research competencies without compromising on the quality of methodological training.

Enhancing Research Design for Career Advancement

One often-overlooked aspect of designing actionable research is its application in real-world scenarios, particularly in aligning research efforts with career advancement. A well-constructed research design not only contributes to academic and professional knowledge but can also serve as a stepping stone for career development in competitive job markets.

For individuals aiming to transition into lucrative career paths, leveraging their research capabilities to address industry-relevant problems can be especially rewarding. For example, creating a research design tailored to examining the impact of newly emerging technologies or market trends provides valuable insights that employers are increasingly seeking. Whether focusing on healthcare, technology, education, or other growing industries, aligning your research with fields that have high employability potential ensures your work remains relevant and impactful.

Additionally, gaining certifications in specialized fields can complement your research skills, expanding your employability. Certifications, particularly in high-demand sectors, can make you more marketable to employers and help you secure roles that offer competitive pay. If you're seeking guidance on acquiring qualifications to elevate your professional profile, consider exploring programs that lead to high paying certificate jobs, which are specifically designed to blend expertise with increased earning potential.

Ultimately, integrating your research design with career goals creates a dynamic synergy. It positions you as a researcher capable of both academic rigor and practical applicability—skills that are invaluable in today’s job market. This alignment not only improves your professional prospects but also ensures that your contributions address real-world challenges in innovative ways.

How Can Accelerated Degree Programs Enhance Research Design?

Accelerated degree programs offer a streamlined pathway to gaining advanced theoretical and methodological skills, enabling researchers to integrate emerging trends into their designs more rapidly. These programs cultivate rigorous analytical capabilities and foster agile decision-making—all while minimizing the traditional time-to-competency gap. By expediting exposure to contemporary research tools and data analytics techniques, accelerated credentials can empower professionals to develop more responsive and innovative research infrastructures. If you are evaluating expedited academic avenues, explore What is the fastest degree to get? for options that can accelerate both academic and career progression.

How Can Short-Term Certifications Bolster Practical Research Design Skills?

Short-term certifications provide focused, practical training that complements traditional academic credentials. They equip researchers with hands-on expertise in contemporary methodologies, advanced analytical tools, and streamlined data management techniques. This approach enables faster adaptation to evolving industry practices and research technologies without extensive time investment. For those looking to bridge theory with immediate application, integrating such specialized training can yield a more agile and robust research design framework, as demonstrated by initiatives like 6 month online courses that pay well.

How Can Academic Credentials Elevate Your Research Design?

Academic credentials—ranging from targeted certifications to advanced degrees—play a pivotal role in refining research design. A robust educational background not only deepens methodological insight but also enhances analytical rigor by aligning academic theories with current best practices. For professionals seeking to bolster their credibility, pursuing specialized courses or programs can lead to novel approaches in structuring robust research frameworks. In some cases, leveraging accessible academic pathways such as the easiest degree to get can provide an effective entry point into research excellence. Continuous academic development ensures that research designs evolve with emerging trends and industry standards, thereby reinforcing reliable, innovative, and actionable research outcomes.

What Are the Common Pitfalls in Research Design and How Can They Be Overcome?

Research design may falter when objectives are ambiguously defined, when data sources do not align with anticipated outcomes, or when methodologies fail to adapt to emerging trends. Addressing these challenges requires rigorous planning, continuous validation of assumptions, and proactive mitigation of biases throughout the research process. Researchers benefit from refining their skill sets through focused professional development, including pursuing online certificate programs that offer updated strategies and industry best practices.

How Do You Assess the Effectiveness of Your Research Design?

To ensure your research design delivers results that are both accurate and actionable, consider implementing performance metrics and validation checkpoints throughout your study. Assess the alignment of your design with your central research questions by measuring aspects such as sample adequacy, data validity, and bias minimization. Establish clear key performance indicators that cover methodological rigor, reproducibility of results, and the adaptability of the design to evolving data contexts. Regular peer reviews and pilot studies further inform iterative adjustments that refine the overall framework. Additionally, elevating your methodological expertise through targeted educational opportunities—such as pursuing a degree in 6 months—can provide practical insights into optimizing design effectiveness.

Key Insights

• Definition and Importance: Research design is a structured plan to answer specific research questions, integrating various components and methods for data collection and analysis.
• Research Design vs. Methodology: While research design outlines the approach to the research problem, methodology details the implementation of this design.
• Goals of Research Design: The primary goal is to ensure data addresses the research problem clearly, accurately, and without bias, ultimately minimizing error and producing reliable conclusions.
• Characteristics of Good Research Design:
  • Neutrality: Ensures objective data analysis.
  • Validity: Uses appropriate tools and techniques for accurate measurement.
  • Reliability: Generates consistent results across repeated studies.
  • Generalizability: Applies findings to broader contexts beyond the study sample.
• Basic Research Methods: Include experiments, surveys, interviews, questionnaires, case studies, observational trials, and the Delphi method.
• Types of Research Design:
  • Descriptive: Focuses on describing a case or phenomenon without exploring causality.
  • Experimental: Establishes cause-and-effect relationships through controlled experiments.
  • Correlational: Examines associations between variables using statistical analysis.
  • Explanatory: Expands on findings to explain the underlying theory without providing conclusive answers.
• Approaches to Research Design:
  • Quantitative: Uses statistical analysis for objective, numerical data.
  • Qualitative: Explores subjective experiences and social constructs through textual data.
  • Pragmatic: Adopts the most suitable methods from both quantitative and qualitative approaches as needed.

FAQ

1. What is the main purpose of research design? The main purpose of research design is to create a structured plan that ensures data collected addresses the research problem clearly, accurately, and without bias, thus minimizing errors and producing reliable conclusions.
2. How does research design differ from research methodology? Research design outlines the overall approach and framework for addressing the research problem, while research methodology details the specific procedures and techniques used to implement the design.
3. What are the key characteristics of a good research design? A good research design is neutral, valid, reliable, and generalizable. It ensures objective data analysis, uses appropriate measurement tools, generates consistent results, and applies findings broadly.
4. Can you combine different research methods in one study? Yes, combining different research methods is possible and often beneficial. Depending on the research design, various methods can be used to collect complementary data, enhancing the study's overall quality and comprehensiveness.
5. What is the difference between descriptive and experimental research design? Descriptive research design focuses on describing a case, situation, or phenomenon without exploring causality. In contrast, experimental research design establishes cause-and-effect relationships by manipulating variables in a controlled environment.
6. Why is it important to differentiate between quantitative and qualitative research approaches? Differentiating between quantitative and qualitative approaches is important because they serve different purposes. Quantitative research seeks objective, numerical data and statistical analysis, while qualitative research explores subjective experiences and social constructs through textual data.
7. What is a pragmatic approach to research design? A pragmatic approach to research design uses the most suitable methods from both quantitative and qualitative approaches as needed, focusing on practical solutions to address the research problem without adhering strictly to one methodology.
8. How do you ensure the validity and reliability of your research design? Ensuring validity and reliability involves using appropriate measurement tools and techniques, designing the study to generate consistent results, and applying findings broadly. Regularly reviewing and validating data collection and analysis processes also helps maintain these qualities.

References:

1. Abutabenjeh, S., Jaradat, R. (2018). Clarification of research design, research methods, and research methodology: A guide for public administration researchers and practitioners. SAGE Journals (36) 3, 237-258.  https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0144739418775787
2. Aichholzer G. (2009) The Delphi Method: Eliciting Experts’ Knowledge in Technology Foresight. In: Bogner A., Littig B., Menz W. (eds.) Interviewing Experts. Research Methods Series. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 252-274.  https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244276_13
3. Alzheimer Europe (2009). Research Understanding Dementia Research Types of Research Research Methods. Alzheimer-Europe
4. Anastas, Jeane W. (1999). Research Design for Social Work and the Human Services, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. JSTOR
5. Blaikie, N. (2000). Designing Social Research: The Logic of Anticipation. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Google Books
6. Bliesmer, E. (1970). Problems of research design in classroom studies. Journal of Reading Behavior, 2 (Winter), 318. Sage
7. Bordens, K.S., & Abbott, B.B. (2018). Research Design and Methods: A Process Approach, 10th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
8. Bouma, G. (1994). Real-world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 30 (3), 344-345. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F144078339403000311
9. Burney, S., & Saleem, H. (2008). Inductive & Deductive Research Approach. Lecture delivered on 06-03-2008 at Auditorium of Faculty of Arts and Science, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan. ResearchGate
10. Creswell, J. W. (2015). An Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Social and Behavioral Sciences Research Consortium
11. Creswell, J.W., & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Books
12. de Vaus, D. (2001). What Is Research Design? In Research Design in Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. GradesFixer (2019). Research Methodology: Exploratory, Descriptive and Explanatory. GradesFixer
14. McCombes, S. (2019). Research Design: Types, Methods, and Examples. Scribbr
15. Mukaka, M. (2012). Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. The Journal of Medical Association of Malawi, 24 (3), 6971. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23638278/
16. Robson, C. (1993). Real-world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Google Books
17. Saunders, M., et al.  (2009). Research Methods for Business Students. (5th ed.). London, UK: Pearson Education.
18. Sassower, R. (2017). Causality and correlation. In B.S. Turner (Ed.) The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory. New York, NY: Wiley.
19. Teddlie, C., Johnson, R.B. (2008). Methodological Thought Before the 20th Century. In C. Teddlie & A. Tashakkori (Eds.). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Vogt, W.P., Gardner, D.C., & Haeffele, L.M. (2012). When to Use What Research Design, 1st ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Google Books
21. Yin, R. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Researchgate