39 Interactive Learning Statistics: 2025 Data, Trends & Predictions

by Imed Bouchrika, Phd

Co-Founder and Chief Data Scientist

Share

Pedagogy is ever evolving as it is embedded in a larger social context. New ideas, sensibilities, and preferences mold how teaching and learning are conducted. Also, scientific research has had a hand in its evolution. It has been pointed out time and time again that certain approaches perform statistically better than others. Today, thanks to modern technology, information is much more accessible. Anyone can basically learn without leaving their homes through online courses and online degree programs (Purdue Online, 2020). So, students are now taking advantage of accessible and affordable online bachelor’s degree programs.

Nevertheless, one thing stays the same. Learning facilitators still need to be good communicators. As such, many argue that they espouse interactive learning to help acquire and maintain students’ attention and to be “effective and efficient" at it (Pradono et al., 2013).

But not everyone may be convinced of the effectiveness of interactive learning. That is why in this article, we will try to understand what interactive learning and interactive teaching are, the tools that teachers can use to engage their students in these approaches, statistics on how students learn best as well as scientific studies regarding this pedagogical method.

Interactive Learning Statistics Table of Contents

1. What is Interactive Learning
2. Interactive Learning Statistics
3. Short History of Interactive Learning
4. Components of Interactive Learning
5. Paradigms and Models of Interactive Learning
6. Considerations in Adopting Interactive Learning
7. How can interactive learning bridge the skills gap for lucrative career sectors?
8. How can interactive learning support students with diverse learning needs?
9. How can interactive learning drive innovation in curriculum design?
10. How can interactive learning be integrated with traditional teaching methods?
11. How can interactive learning support working adult learners?
12. Practical Applications in Teacher Training Programs
13. How can interactive learning help students earn industry-recognized credentials?

There have been several paradigm shifts in education. For a long time, learning was linear, a pedagogical strategy focused on the program itself. It required that students first familiarize themselves with the ideas and topics of the first lesson before they move on to the next. The approach has no flexibility, as it requires the learner to acquire knowledge in a straight sequence. 

While linear learning has received its fair share of critics, the results of experiments conducted by Granger (2012), however, revealed that linear learning can be more effective than flexible learning in certain situations. This implies that there is no one best approach. Rather, it is entirely dependent on the context, which includes the learning styles of students and how motivated they are to learn. 

Nevertheless, the education paradigm shifted to interactive learning from linear. The former approach involved various types of interactions as well as the use of multimedia materials. There have also been moves from simple presentations or slideshows to more interactive learning tools, delivered by computer applications specifically designed for such purposes. The instructional modality required active student participation through interactive sites for education. Since it can be difficult to understand what interactive learning is all about, a primer on it is essential before moving on to interactive learning statistics.

Interactive Learning

What is Interactive Learning?

Interactive learning is a teaching method that supports educators taking a hands-on approach in engaging students. Through this procedure, there is social interaction between the educator and the learner (Interactive Learning Project, 2020). 

The dynamics in the classroom also change in that students are no longer passive participants. Instead, they are also part of the conversation and become active participants. They not only engage with the instructor but with each other as well. And, of course, it also means that they utilize the modern educational tools available. 

This changes the way school activities are handled. For example, schoolwork that used to be take-home is tackled by the whole class inside the classroom together with the teacher. Another example would be instead of just listening to teachers explain course topics, learners supplement their understanding at home through multimedia (Interactive Learning Project, 2020) and interactive learning environments.

Interactive learning has proven to be effective. Beaman and Wheldall (2000) found that when instructors increase their positive verbal mediations, there is a corresponding increase in the focus of students on tasks at hand. In addition, the defining aspect of interactive learning is receptivity to the action of the learner during the learning process (Moreno & Mayer, 2007).

But there is much more to what interactive learning can offer. With constant technological innovations, digital learning technologies have also made their way to classrooms and other learning spaces. They now augment lessons or become the tool for the educator to deliver their lessons. As such, postsecondary institutions like video game design schools have adopted the practice and seamlessly integrated it with various applications. 

Interactive Learning Statistics

Interactive learning is now in use in many classrooms around the world. Educators are also utilizing different devices to facilitate it often with hands-on learning statistics. But this approach does not just apply to the academe: it can work in workplace settings, too. In fact, certain industries rely on interactive approaches to training to get their employees ready for any situation. These include team building games and other engaging activities.

Statistics per Sector

Education

• 74% of teachers have digital game-based learning to enhance their lessons (Juraschka, 2019).
• 93% of class time is spent on class tasks when using game-based learning (Juraschka, 2019).
• 52% of young students have played educational games (Murray, 2012).
• Video games can be effective in classroom settings because 91% of school-age children are familiar with them (Murray, 2012). Game-based learning statistics also give a lot of insight into learning.
• However, with only 46% of children having access to the technology required for video game-based learning, it is difficult to implement fully (Murray, 2012).
• 54% of U.S. educators strongly agree that game-based learning is a must-have (Murray, 2012).
• 38% of U.S. teachers agree that it is needed in the classroom (Murray, 2012).
• Only 8% of U.S. instructors are unsure whether it is a necessary addition in classes (Murray, 2012).

Work Setting

• In workplaces, the adoption of game-based learning has a compound annual growth rate of 53.4% (Ibañez, 2018).
• Research has shown that microlearning improved learners’ performance by 17% (Fatemi, 2020).
• Additionally, it added 50% more to the engagement rate (Fatemi, 2020).
• The Pentagon is said to have invested $479 million in a Microsoft contract for VR, AR, and AI technology for soldier training (Fowler, 2019).
• 82% of companies that are undergoing AR/VR implementation say that benefits are equal to or exceed their expectations (Fowler, 2019).

Statistics per Device

Computers

• 56% of U.S. students use laptop computers in the classroom in a typical week (Deloitte, 2016).
• 54% of learners in the United States use desktop computers, on the other hand (Deloitte, 2016).
• In U.S. classrooms, educational videos are used 67% of the time (Deloitte, 2016).
• Educational apps or software follow with the frequency of use at 65% in U.S. classrooms (Deloitte, 2016).

Tablets

• A study involving two cohorts showed that when they first acquired laptops and tablets, 65% of students preferred the latter (Namuddu & Watts 2020).
• 51% of students in the United States use tablets on a regular week in school (Deloitte, 2016).
• Educational video games are used often (52%) on a normal week in a U.S. classroom (Deloitte, 2016).

Smartphones

• Only 10% of college students preferred to use their smartphones for studying (Namuddu & Watts 2020).
• This declined to 5% towards the end of the academic year (Namuddu & Watts 2020).
• Students in the Czech Republic who used an app for English language learning scored 43.9 points out of 60 points on average in a final test (Klimova, 2019).
• Meanwhile, students from the control group garnered 31.8 points out of 60 points on average (Klimova, 2019).
• 44% of respondents from the U.K. said that rapid access is a major advantage of mobile learning (Uther, 2019).
• 26% said ease of access is the main benefit (Uther, 2019).

Statistics per Education Level

K-12

• A study involving 105 preschoolers showed that children exposed to the gesture interactive game-based learning approach had superior learning performance and motor skills (Hsiao & Chen, 2016).
• Five preschoolers in Malaysia agreed that they enjoyed an interactive AR alphabet book while eight pupils strongly agreed (Rambli, Matcha, & Sulaiman, 2013).
• Six children involved in the study agreed that they wanted to play again (Rambli, et al., 2013).
• On the other hand, nine strongly agreed that they would play the game again (Rambli, et. al., 2013).
• The use of interactive learning techniques in eighth-grade and fourth-grade students yielded positive results (Darling-Hammond, L., Zielezinski, M. B., & Goldman, S., 2014).
• The mean effect size for studies that combined online and face-to-face learning was +0.35, p < .001. This shows that a blended approach had a greater advantage over either face-to-face or online only (Means et al., 2010).
• Around 5 million K-12 students have engaged in online or virtual classes in the 2015-2016 school year (Online learning, n.d.).

Higher Education 

• 96% of university students preferred using their mobile devices for learning on the move (Teodorescu, 2015). Some online MSW programs, for instance, can be completed anywhere so long as the student has an internet-enabled device.
• 11% of college students stated that they use their mobile gadgets for learning (Teodorescu, 2015).
• 6% revealed that they utilize mobile devices for their homework (Teodorescu, 2015).
• 81.9% of students engaged with the Facebook page of their course (Irwin, Ball, Desbrow, & Leveritt, 2012).
• However, only 51% considered the page as an effective exercise (Irwin, et al., Leveritt, 2012).
• Nevertheless, 76.4% of students recommended the use of the Facebook page feature in future courses (Irwin, et al., 2012).

Short History of Interactive Learning

Educators are always challenged to keep their students’ attention. They have to learn to be engaging, to come up with interesting activities, and to go beyond traditional pedagogy to ensure that learners understand the information being imparted to them. Teachers seeking to keep their students engaged must employ interesting methods that will sustain the interest of as many students as possible (Ergas, 2016).

It was not always like this, however, as teachers used to be the center of the classroom. The exchange was linear. It means that the pedagogical strategy centered around a study program. It also means that students are required to master module A before they can move on to module B and so forth. The learning process is predetermined and goes on a straight line. There is little room for flexibility for learners in this teaching approach (Linear Learning, 2014). Indeed, the only input from students came from recitations, homework, and projects. Then it evolved to hypermedia learning involving visual and audio learning materials.

Nevertheless, the focus was still on the teacher. But later on, it transformed into the idea that the teacher is no longer the transmitter of knowledge. Rather, the educator has become a facilitator (Tapscott, 1998).

Components of Interactive Learning

As mentioned previously, interactive learning involves student participation. Beyond that, there are other components that must be present for this approach to work. These are the personalization of discussions, learners’ motivation, inclusive learning environments, and student collaboration.

Inclusive Learning Spaces

Interactive learning calls for students to be involved in classroom discussions. This is crucial and requires the teacher to be nurturing and approachable. Thus, they have to create an environment where learners feel that they are accepted and cared for. 

On top of that, lecturers have to make students feel secure in that they can easily ask questions regarding concepts that they do not understand. They should also be comfortable enough to speak with the teacher regarding issues that may pose a challenge to the meeting of deadlines (Stephen, 2018).

Collaboration with and Between Students

Interactive learning does not only involve student-teacher engagement but it also includes student-student collaboration. In this case, it is the task of educators to design activities that allow learners to work with each other. By doing so, students can learn from each other as well and have comprehensive learning of the topic (Kolagani, 2020; Stephen, 2018).

Motivating Learners

Challenging learners taking part in class activities is essential to interactive learning. It should vary between easy and hard to keep students’ attention and to keep them on their toes. The variety would also allow them to be adaptable while enjoying learning about a topic. However, educators should note that the challenges they pose should also be signed with the learners’ level (Kolagani, 2020). 

One of the ways that educators can do so is by steering clear of textbooks. Cristina Caba, a lecturer for more than two decades, recommends that teachers provide students with materials that align with their needs and interests. This is also a great time to introduce activities that educators themselves made.

Another method of motivating students involves explaining the instruction to students clearly. This way, when they perform a task, they can perform well. 

Personalized Approach

While it is impossible to tailor the teaching approach for every individual, it is possible for the teacher to personalize the discussion and the content. They can share anecdotes and analogies that make the topic more familiar and approachable for the learners. Additionally, they can produce types of content that are suitable for the concepts they are tackling and not just rely on textbooks (UC Davis, 2020).

Digital Learning Technology

In today’s classrooms, computers and handheld devices are commonplace. An example is what could be seen among Chicago Public Schools, which have provided 100,000 laptops and tablets to students (Bauer, 2020). This was due to the coronavirus pandemic, but they are not the first to implement such a program. Additionally, 60% of principals involved in the Speak Up Research Project for Digital Learning said that they assigned a mobile device to students. This initiative reached 10,600 public and private schools in 3,200 districts in 2017 (Mathewson, 2018).  In doing so, they enabled teachers to demonstrate difficult concepts interactively while also enabling students to complete their programs, whether a business or psychology degree, among other fields of study.

For example, lecturers were able to better show and explain formulas in mathematics. In fact, 53% of principals in schools with 1:1 student to device ratio reported the effectiveness of said devices in math classes (Mathewson, 2018). Meanwhile, it allowed students to have colorful discussions with their fellow learners even when they were not in school but on web-based platforms like social media pages and school discussion boards.

Paradigms and Models of Interactive Learning

Basic Interactive Content

In marketing, interactive content is the new king. This is the kind of content that engages an individual actively. This has evolved with the need to catch a user’s attention since the average person pays attention for only eight seconds before losing concentration (McSpadden, 2015).

The same applies to education. That is why elearning platforms implement basic interactive content that adheres to the Shareable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) standards. These remove learning obstacles that may present themselves in cross-platform learning.

Gamification

Gamification is one of the approaches that teachers can employ to keep students focused on learning. As the name suggests, it involves adding gaming elements where learners aim for rewards as they finish tasks and progress through the course or the lesson plan. Researchers have found that through gamification, students become more motivated in learning. This also gives them a more enjoyable learning experience (de Freitas & de Freitas, 2012; Sahin & Arslan Namli, 2016).

Students who have experienced a gamified approach to education said that they enjoyed the process. They also pointed out that it reinforced the knowledge they gained previously. It enabled them to communicate and engage in friendly competition with their fellow students as well. However, there were downsides to the method, too: the learning environment was competitive and fueled by ambition (Yildirim & Demir, 2016).

Personalized Learning

Personalized learning as an idea has been around for decades. It means providing students with learning opportunities using individualized learning paths. However, in the modern sense, it involves using software to create a unique educational pathway for every learner. An online psychology degree in Texas may be designed with this in mind. In this case, the software adjusts to the progress rate and learning capabilities of students. The software uses data from students’ activities to create a tailored learning path and to make other big decisions (Herold, 2019).

The idea behind this approach is that students learning is customized based on their own strengths and weaknesses. This method also takes into consideration their preferences, learning background, and experiences. After all, learning experience involves interactions, programs, courses, or any engagement that happens in schools and classrooms or outside of those. Moreover, these include students learning from their instructors as well as through games and software or apps.

While it may drive some people into thinking that this method would replace teachers, research shows that educators are a crucial element to the success of personalized learning. Indeed, instructors need to expand their skillsets to respond accurately to the needs of students. Thus, they can be better equipped to help learners achieve their learning goals (Bishop, 2019).

Serious Gaming

The use of games in education was first popularized in the 20th century from the 1960s to the 1970s. At this time, paper-based games abounded (Rice, 2007). It was not until the turn of the century that educational games, also called serious games, really took off. Nintendo was one of the first companies that populated this niche. It created Leapster, a hand-held gaming device that had educational content (Gray et al., 2009).

It is not just young school children that are benefiting from serious games, though. Even health professionals are. The only downside, in this case, is that game design highly varies. The technicalities are inconsistent and reports are few (Olszewski & Wolbrink, 2017). Interactive video statistics are continually being collected to improve the gaming experience.

Multimedia-Based Learning

Multimedia lessons combine text, audio, video, and graphics to impart concepts and explain topics to students. This allows the educator to cater to diverse learning styles.

When taking the multimedia approach, the educator must keep in mind to be astute in creating a mix. This way, they can be certain that every kind of learner can keep up with the discussions. This would also enable them to provide a more learner-centric environment (Muthukumar, 2005).

Mobile Learning/Microlearning

Mobile learning carries the concept of elearning to handheld devices like smartphones and tablets. This enables learners to study whenever or wherever it is convenient for them (Crescente & Lee, 2011). It has made learning easier for those who are always on the go.

Schools and companies are not the only ones using it either. Museums also utilize it to supplement the education of visitors regarding their displays (Walker, 2006).

Microlearning, on the other hand, is a targeted approach that allows the learner to study an idea, concept, or topic bit by bit. It is “any brief and targeted learning object that spans between three to six minutes" (Andriotis, 2016).

This can be done on any device but is typically on mobile gadgets. Indeed, microlearning platforms make it a point that their interfaces adapt to small screens. This is because most individuals do not like to open their computers or laptops after a day of work to engage in learning activities.

Considerations in Adopting Interactive Learning

Challenges to Adopting Interactive Learning

One of the foremost barriers to adopting digital interactive learning in the classroom is the lack of adequate technology. This includes minimal access to laptop and desktop computers, tablets, and smartphones. On top of that, not every place has a strong enough internet connection that they can have constant connectivity.

Another challenge is training. Teachers need professional development to maximize the use of interactive learning technology. Though they have confidence in learning how to utilize them, at the rate of the innovation, they would need constant training and skills upgrade.

It is also important that teachers get the right kind of training. There are numerous learning technologies available and at some point, they may need to have a specific, rather than a varied, skillset. Case in point, 21 teachers who had access to iPads had mixed opinions regarding their usefulness (Johnson et al., 2016). Because of that, the investment of the school on the technology may be moot.

That said, the beliefs and attitudes of teachers themselves can prove to be another barrier to the effectiveness of learning technology in the classroom. There can even be resistance, as many educators are used to the teacher-centric setting and are not familiar with interactive learning games. For technology to be effective, they need to adopt a learner-centric outlook.

On top of that, technology can also become a distraction in the classroom, which would only serve to frustrate teachers (Schuler, 2019).

Recommendations for Improving Interactive Learning Adoption

One of the first steps that schools and workplaces can take is to create policies to guide the use of technology for learning. For example, instead of treating iPads as paper replacements, organizations can have a lesson plan that centers around an app. In this way, educators and trainers can ask learners to put away the device when not in-task (Schuler, 2019).

When it comes to teacher resistance, schools and organizations have to educate the educators themselves. They need to provide plenty of information to convince them of the benefits of learning technologies (Lynch, 2018). It is also crucial to establish policies and procedures within the institution to encourage the application of interactive learning.

Additionally, education administrators can set up training sessions for instructors to guide them in the use of new technology in making their courses interactive. Moreover, based on the second design rule, the teacher, instead of just being a provider of information, should also function as a coach and learning facilitator (Dochy et al. 2002 cited in Baeten et al., 2016).

And as has been mentioned previously, the technology advancement rate is quite fast that sometimes it is difficult to keep up with. In that case, organizations have to put in place plans, especially budget plans, for adopting new technologies and adapting to trends (Lynch, 2018).

How can interactive learning bridge the skills gap for lucrative career sectors?

Interactive learning methods enable learners to acquire industry‐specific competencies through simulation, hands-on projects, and scenario-based exercises that mirror real-world professional challenges. This approach allows students to refine both technical expertise and soft skills—such as critical thinking and collaborative problem solving—tailored to meet high-demand industry standards. For example, virtual laboratories and interactive case studies can mimic the practical environments found in fields like healthcare, helping learners transition smoothly into roles that demand applied knowledge. Ultimately, these strategies not only enhance academic achievement but also prepare students for competitive markets, including opportunities in the highest paying jobs medical field bachelor's degree.

How can interactive learning support students with diverse learning needs?

Interactive learning has proven to be a powerful tool in catering to students with diverse learning needs, offering flexibility and personalized approaches to enhance inclusivity. Below are ways in which interactive learning can support these students:

• Multisensory learning: Interactive tools provide a variety of sensory inputs, such as visual, auditory, and kinesthetic elements. This variety helps students with different learning styles, including those with disabilities like dyslexia or auditory processing disorders, to engage more effectively with the material.
• Adaptive learning technologies: Personalized platforms can adjust content and learning pace based on student performance. These technologies offer tailored support for students who require additional time or alternative approaches to grasp concepts, ensuring no one is left behind.
• Engagement through gamification: Gamified elements in interactive learning increase motivation and reduce anxiety for students with attention difficulties or autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The structured, rule-based nature of games provides a safe and predictable learning environment.
• Real-time feedback: Interactive platforms often offer immediate feedback, allowing students to learn from mistakes and adjust their approach quickly. This feature is especially helpful for students with learning disabilities who may benefit from repeated practice and real-time corrections.
• Collaborative learning: Interactive group activities promote social learning, helping students with social challenges, such as those with ASD, to develop communication and teamwork skills in a supportive setting.

How can interactive learning drive innovation in curriculum design?

Institutions can leverage interactive learning to refine and modernize curriculum design through iterative feedback and data analytics. By integrating digital simulations, real-time assessments, and adaptive modules, educators can reshape course content to better align with current industry standards and learner expectations. This approach fosters collaboration among curriculum developers, instructors, and students, ensuring that content remains relevant and rigorously tested in dynamic educational environments. Innovations in curriculum design also encourage a shift toward competency-based outcomes, preparing learners for rapid changes in the professional landscape, similar to opportunities offered by the best accelerated bachelor's degree online.

How can interactive learning be integrated with traditional teaching methods?

A blended approach combining traditional instruction with digital interactivity can foster a more comprehensive educational experience. By preserving the structure of established curricula alongside dynamically engaging activities, educators can reinforce foundational theories while encouraging active learning through digital tools. This integration enables targeted instructional strategies, continuous formative assessment, and adaptive content delivery without discarding the reliability of conventional teaching methods. Furthermore, aligning the classroom strategy with flexible academic options, such as easy degree courses, supports personalized learning pathways that address diverse educational needs while maintaining academic rigor.

How can interactive learning support working adult learners?

Interactive learning offers tailored pathways that accommodate the demanding schedules of working adults and non-traditional students. By incorporating asynchronous modules, simulation-based exercises, and real-time feedback, this approach enables learners to engage deeply with content while managing professional and personal responsibilities. The method also fosters collaborative digital environments where working students can share experiences and problem-solve in real time, thereby enhancing both technical and soft skills. Institutions that integrate these strategies demonstrate a commitment to lifelong learning, as evidenced by initiatives from the best affordable online college for working professionals, ensuring education remains flexible, accessible, and aligned with evolving industry demands.

Practical Applications in Teacher Training Programs

Developing an educator's capacity to implement interactive learning methods is fundamental to ensuring successful integration within diverse educational settings. Teacher training programs can play a pivotal role in equipping educators with the necessary skills and tools to foster interactive and engaging learning environments. By incorporating interactive techniques and digital tools into workshops and certification courses, schools and training institutions can enable educators to evolve from lecturers to facilitators who actively engage students.

A strategic option for aspiring education professionals is to explore advanced degrees that emphasize modern pedagogical approaches. Institutions offering affordable and flexible degree programs, like some of the cheapest online EdD programs, provide a practical route for educators to deepen their expertise in these methodologies. Such programs not only lower the financial barrier for advanced education but also emphasize practice-oriented methodologies, ensuring that future educators are well-prepared to adapt to varied classroom dynamics.

Additionally, preparing educators for real-world challenges requires integrating case studies and simulations within training curricula. By offering experiences that replicate classroom scenarios with diverse learners, teacher training programs can enhance teachers' readiness to implement inclusive interactive learning strategies effectively. This strengthens the connection between training and practice while empowering educators to meet the needs of students with varying abilities and backgrounds.

How is the Effectiveness of Interactive Learning Measured?

Evaluating interactive learning involves a multifaceted approach that combines quantitative metrics with qualitative insights. Educators can analyze student performance through assessments, engagement analytics, and observational rubrics designed to capture real-time responsiveness. Surveys and focus groups also provide valuable feedback on learners’ satisfaction and retention, allowing for continuous refinement of teaching strategies. Institutions can use this data-driven approach to adjust instructional methods in alignment with evolving educational standards and policy research, similar to those found in an affordable online master's in public policy.

How does interactive learning influence academic and career advancement?

Interactive learning cultivates essential soft skills such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and collaborative communication that extend beyond the classroom. By engaging with dynamic digital tools and peer-to-peer interactions, learners develop a flexible mindset that not only supports academic progression but also enhances professional adaptability. This approach aligns with modern educational trends where competency-based learning and practical experiences are highly valued. Learners who master these interactive techniques may find themselves better prepared for advanced studies and career transitions, ultimately opening pathways to pursue opportunities like an accelerated bachelor's degree and other innovative academic programs.

How can interactive learning help students earn industry-recognized credentials?

Interactive learning environments provide opportunities for experiential education that align with the practical skill requirements of industry certifications. By engaging in project-based tasks and simulation exercises, students develop hands-on competencies reflective of real-world challenges. This approach cultivates critical problem-solving abilities and adaptability, which in turn prepares learners for certification exams and industry-standard assessments. Moreover, interactive modules can accelerate skill acquisition, creating pathways to achieve certificate programs that pay well and further bolstering career readiness.

Conclusion

Interactive learning has been through many changes. It has gone from simple teacher-student and student-student interactions to digitized learning and interactions. Possibly, it will go through many changes in the near future as technological innovations continue to abound. So, if you want to stay in the know, you have to keep up with the interactive learning trends in research and industry. 

Though there may be resistance and barriers, both learners and teachers now rely on digital interactive learning to access information at their convenience. It has also augmented how they serve knowledge and enable students to understand concepts and topics better.

On the other hand, learners can use digital learning technology to better grasp ideas that they are at first unable to understand fully. They can also use it to discuss with their fellow students to exchange information, thus allowing for collaborative learning, and the real meaning of interactive learning.

Key Insights

• Shift to Interactive Learning: Pedagogy has evolved from traditional linear methods to interactive learning approaches, emphasizing student participation, collaboration, and the use of multimedia materials.
• Technological Integration: The integration of digital learning technologies, such as computers, tablets, and educational apps, has become commonplace, enhancing the learning experience and making education more accessible.
• Effectiveness of Interactive Learning: Research indicates that interactive learning can increase student focus, engagement, and overall learning performance, making it a valuable approach in both educational and workplace settings.
• Components of Interactive Learning: Effective interactive learning involves personalization, inclusive environments, student collaboration, and the use of various digital tools to engage learners.
• Challenges and Recommendations: Barriers to adopting interactive learning include inadequate technology, lack of training, and resistance from educators. Overcoming these challenges requires comprehensive policies, ongoing professional development, and strategic planning for technology integration.

FAQ

1. What is interactive learning? Interactive learning is a teaching method that involves active student participation and engagement through social interactions and the use of multimedia tools. It shifts the focus from teacher-centered instruction to a more collaborative and dynamic learning environment.
2. How does interactive learning differ from traditional learning methods? Traditional learning methods are often linear and teacher-centered, requiring students to follow a set sequence of lessons. Interactive learning, on the other hand, emphasizes student engagement, collaboration, and the use of digital tools to enhance the learning experience.
3. What are the benefits of interactive learning? Interactive learning increases student engagement, improves focus on tasks, enhances understanding through hands-on activities, and fosters collaboration among students. It also allows for the use of multimedia materials to cater to different learning styles.
4. What are some common interactive learning tools used in classrooms? Common tools include digital game-based learning platforms, educational apps, multimedia content (videos, audio, graphics), virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies, and interactive whiteboards.
5. How is interactive learning implemented in workplace training? In workplace settings, interactive learning is used for training through methods like team-building games, microlearning modules, VR and AR simulations, and gamified learning platforms to enhance employee skills and engagement.
6. What are the challenges in adopting interactive learning? Challenges include limited access to technology, inadequate internet connectivity, need for teacher training, resistance from educators accustomed to traditional methods, and potential distractions from technology in the classroom.
7. How can schools overcome barriers to interactive learning? Schools can overcome barriers by establishing clear policies for technology use, providing continuous professional development for teachers, creating budget plans for technology upgrades, and fostering a supportive environment for adopting new teaching methods.
8. What role do teachers play in interactive learning? Teachers act as facilitators and coaches in interactive learning environments, guiding students through collaborative activities, using digital tools to enhance lessons, and personalizing content to meet diverse learning needs.
9. What is the significance of personalized learning in interactive education? Personalized learning tailors educational experiences to individual student needs, strengths, and preferences, often using software to create customized learning paths. This approach helps students achieve better outcomes by addressing their unique learning styles and progress rates.
10. How can interactive learning be applied to different education levels? Interactive learning can be applied across all education levels, from K-12 to higher education, by using age-appropriate digital tools, gamified learning platforms, and collaborative activities that engage students and enhance their understanding of various subjects.

References:

• Andriotis, N. (2016, May 11). What is microlearning and why you should care. TalentLMS 
• Baeten, M., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., Parmentier, E., & Vanderbruggen, A. (2016). Student-Centred Learning Environments: An Investigation into Student Teachers’ Instructional Preferences and Approaches to Learning. Learning Environments Research, 19 (1) 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9190-5
• Bauer, K. (2020, March 30). CPS sending 100,000 laptops, tablets to students to learn at home — A sign schools could stay closed for longer. Block Club Chicago
• Beaman, R. & Wheldall, K. (2000). Teachers’ use of approval and disapproval in the classroom. Educational psychology, 20 (4), 431-446. https://doi.org/10.1080/713663753
• Bishop, P. (2019, July 5). What is personalized learning and why is it so controversial? 5 questions answered. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/what-is-personalized-learning-and-why-is-it-so-controversial-5-questions-answered-118030
• Darling-Hammond, L., Zielezinski, M. B., & Goldman, S. (2014). Using Technology to Support At-Risk Students’ Learning. PDF. Stanford. https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/using-technology-support-risk-students%E2%80%99-learning.pdf
• Deloitte. (2016). 2016 digital education survey. Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/technology-media-telecommunications/us-tmt-digital-education-survey.pdf
• Ergas, O. (2016). Attention Please: Positioning Attention at the Center of Curriculum and Pedagogy. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 31 (2), 66-81. https://journal.jctonline.org/index.php/jct/article/view/581
• Fatemi, F. (2020, March 26). How to shift out of the Dark Ages of learning and development in the workplace. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/falonfatemi/2020/03/26/how-to-shift-out-of-the-dark-ages-of-learning-and-development-in-the-workplace/#58967eac666b
• Fowler, G. (2019, November 27). Council post: The impact of VR, AI and AR in the workplace. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinessdevelopmentcouncil/2019/11/27/the-impact-of-vr-ai-and-ar-in-the-workplace/#1c467ea2132e
• Gray, J. H., Bulat, J., Jaynes, C., & Cunningham, A. (2009). LeapFrog learning design: playful approaches to literacy. In Druin, A (Ed.) Mobile technology for children: Designing for Interaction and Learning, 171-194. Burlington, MA: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21237
• Herold, B. (2019, November 5). What is personalized learning? Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2019/11/06/what-is-personalized-learning.html
• Hsiao, H., & Chen, J. (2016). Using a gesture interactive game-based learning approach to improve preschool children’s learning performance and motor skills. Computers & Education, 95, 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.005
• Lynch, M. (2018, May 12). How to overcome 10 digital learning challenges. The Tech Edvocate. https://www.thetechedvocate.org/how-to-overcome-10-digital-learning-challenges/
• Ibañez, F. C. (2018, October 23). The promising future of the game-based learning market. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/the-promising-future-of-the-game-based-learning-market
• Interactive Learning Project. (2020). What is interactive learning. Australian National University. https://services.anu.edu.au/education-support/interactive-learning/what-is-interactive-learning
• Irwin, C., Ball, L., Desbrow, B., & Leveritt, M. (2012). Students’ perceptions of using Facebook as an interactive learning resource at university. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1221-1232. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260794505_Students%27_perceptions_of_using_FacebookR_as_an_interactive_learning_resource_at_university
• Juraschka, R. (2019, September 29). How digital game-based learning improves student success. Prodigy Math Blog. https://www.prodigygame.com/blog/digital-game-based-learning/
• Klimova, B. (2019. Impact of mobile learning on students’ achievement results. Education Sciences, 9(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020090
• Kolagani, S. (2020, January 29). What are the fundamental components of interactive learning events. CommLab India. https://blog.commlabindia.com/elearning-design/fundamental-components-of-interactive-learning-events
• Linear learning. (2014, January 15). Click4it. https://www.click4it.org/index.php/Linear_Learning#:~:text=Linear%20learning%20is%20an%20educational,in%20opposition%20to%20flexible%20learning
• Mathewson, T. G. (2020, March 30). The learning experience is different in schools that assign laptops, a survey finds. The Hechinger Report. https://hechingerreport.org/the-learning-experience-is-different-in-schools-that-assign-laptops-a-survey-finds/
• McSpadden, K. (2015, May 14). You now have a shorter attention span than a goldfish. Time. https://time.com/3858309/attention-spans-goldfish/
• Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
• Murray, C. (2012, October 26). Do students benefit from game-based learning? [#Infographic]. Technology Solutions That Drive Education. https://edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2012/10/do-students-benefit-game-based-learning-infographic
• Muthukumar, S. L. (2005). Creating interactive multimedia-based educational courseware: cognition in learning. Cognition, Technology & Work, 7(1), 4650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-004-0171-1
• Namuddu J. & Watts P.N. (2020) Choice of device to view video lectures: an analysis of two independent cohorts of first-year university students. Research in Learning Technology. http://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2324
• Online learning for K12 students is not a trend or a fad. So how does it affect gifted students? (n.d.). The Thomas B. Fordham Institute. https://fordhaminstitute.org/ohio/commentary/online-learning-k-12-students-not-trend-or-fad-so-how-does-it-affect-gifted
• Purdue Online. (2020). How has technology changed education? Purdue. https://online.purdue.edu/blog/education/how-has-technology-changed-education
• Pradono, S., Astriani, M.S., & Moniaga, J. (2013). A method for interactive learning. International Journal of Communication & Information Technology, 7 (2), 46-48. https://doi.org/10.21512/commit.v7i2.583
• Rambli, D.R.A., Matcha, W., & Sulaiman, S. (2013). Fun learning with AR alphabet book for preschool children. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.11.026
• Rice, J. (2007). Assessing higher order thinking in video games. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(1), 87-100.
• Stephen, A. (2018, December 6). 4 essential components of interactive learning spaces. BandidoBooks. https://www.bandidobooks.com/kids-education/4-essential-components-of-interactive-learning-spaces/
• Tapscott, D (1998). Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation. New York: McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1108/jea.2000.38.3.299.1
• Teodorescu, A. (2015). Mobile learning and its impact on business English learning. Proedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180 (2015), 1535-1540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.303
• UC Davis. (2020). Types of interaction. UC Davis. https://canvas.ucdavis.edu/courses/34528/pages/types-of-interaction?module_item_id=4974
• Uther, M. (2019). Mobile learning — trends and practices. Education Sciences, 9(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010033
• Walker, K. (2006). Introduction: Mapping the Landscape of Mobile Learning. In Sharples, M. (Ed.) Big Issues in Mobile Learning, 2-3. Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham. https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190254/document